Evidence - Toupet Fundoplicatio for GERD, Robot-Assisted

  1. Summary of Literature

    Indications

    • Refractory GERD:
      • Antireflux surgery is appropriate for patients requiring long-term therapy (> 1 year).
    • Complicated GERD:
      • Includes conditions such as LA grade C/D esophagitis or peptic stricture
    • Incomplete Response to Medications:
      • Surgery may benefit patients with initial responsiveness to PPIs but subsequent resistance
    • Patient Preference:
      • For those wishing to avoid lifelong proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy
    • Associated Hiatal Hernias (Type II to IV):
      • Hiatal hernias of these types independently justify surgical intervention

    Note: Preoperative manometry is critical to exclude esophageal motility disorders like achalasia, as fundoplication in undiagnosed achalasia can lead to disastrous outcomes. Similarly, patients with autoimmune esophageal involvement (e.g., CREST syndrome in scleroderma) are not suitable for antireflux surgery.

    Technique

    • Minimally Invasive vs. Open Surgery:
      • Laparoscopic fundoplication has been demonstrated to be superior to open surgery, and guidelines recommend it as the standard approach
    • Type of Fundoplication Wrap:
      •  The controversy between total (Nissen) and partial posterior (Toupet) fundoplication has been explored in numerous studies, including randomized controlled trials (RCTs)

    Evidence from Meta-Analysis by Broeders et al. (2010):

    • Data Analyzed:
    • Included RCTs published between 1997 and 2010, encompassing 404 laparoscopic Nissen and 388 laparoscopic Toupet procedures
    • Key Findings:
    • Postoperative Dysphagia:
      • Higher incidence in Nissen fundoplication
    • Need for Postoperative Dilations:
      • More frequent after Nissen fundoplication
    • Reoperation Rates:
      • Higher in the Nissen group
    • Gas Bloating and Inability to Burp:
      • More commonly associated with Nissen fundoplication
    • Reflux Control:
      • Comparable between the two techniques for pathological acid exposure and reflux esophagitis
    • Operative Time and Hospital Stay:
      • No significant differences between the groups
    • Conclusions:
      • The meta-analysis provides Level 1a evidence favoring laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication for GERD treatment, citing lower rates of postoperative dysphagia and gas-related symptoms without compromising reflux control

    Criticisms and Strengths:

    • Criticisms:
      • Follow-up periods in included studies were relatively short:
        • Four studies followed patients for 12 months
        • Two studies extended to 24 – 27 months
        • Only one study provided a 60- month follow-up
        • Studies were predominantly conducted in expert centers, potentially limiting generalizability
    • Strengths:
      • Focused exclusively on posterior fundoplication (Nissen vs. Toupet), excluding the anterior fundoplication, which is now considered inferior

    Conclusion: The evidence strongly supports the superiority of the 270° Toupet fundoplication over the 360° Nissen fundoplication for GERD management. Toupet offers a similar reduction in reflux symptoms with significantly lower rates of postoperative dysphagia and associated complications.

    Mesh Augmentation in Hiatal Repair

    The use of mesh reinforcement during hiatal hernia repair is a topic of ongoing debate. According to the German S2k guideline, routine reinforcement of the hiatus with foreign material is not recommended due to inconclusive evidence. Current studies primarily focus on patients with large hiatal hernias (> 5 cm²) or paraesophageal hernias, often excluding cases of GERD without hiatal herniaenefits and Risks**

    • Advantages:
      • Reduced recurrence rates of hiatal hernias with mesh reinforcement
    • Risks:
      • Severe complications, such as mesh migration into the esophagus, may necessitate complex corrective surgeries (e.g., Merendino procedure)

    Given the low evidence level, the decision to use mesh should be made on a case-by-case basis. While some studies indicate potential benefits, there is significant variability in the types of mesh, fixation methods, materials, and positioning. Mesh implantation should be considered based on hernia size and further investigated in controlled studies .

    Meta-Analysis by Rajkomar et al. (2023)**

    A meta-analysis published in Hernia evaluated outcomes of laparoscopic repair of large hiatal hernias (LHH) with and without mesh augmentation .

    • **Study Parame  - Included 19 studies (6 RCTs and 13 observational studies) with 1,670 patients (846 with mesh, 824 without)
    • Examined recurrence rates, reoperations, and complications
    • Key Findings:
      • Mesh reduced overall recurrence rates (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25–0.80, p = 0.007)
      • No significant reduction in large recurrences (>2 cm) (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.52–1.67, p = 0.83)
      • Reoperation rates were not significantly reduced (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.39–1.07, p = 0.09)
      • Synthetic meshes were linked to cases of erosion into the esophagus
    • Conclusion:
      • Mesh appears to protect against complete recurrence but does not significantly reduce large recurrences or reoperation rates
      • Patients must be informed about the risk of mesh erosion if synthetic materials are used

    Robotics in Antireflux Surgery

    Robotic-assisted surgery represents a significant advancement in minimally invasive procedures. It offers enhanced 3D visualization, seven degrees of instrument motion, tremor filtering, and superior precision.

    • Benefits:
      • of traditional laparoscopy with rigid instruments
      • Early studies suggest comparable or superior outcomes in high-volume centers

    Postoperative Dysphagia

    Dysphagia, a common issue after fundoplication, has seen improved management with endoscopic dilation using large-bore bougies. Success is typically achieved after 1–2 sessions, and reoperation rates for persistent dysphagia remain low.

    Hiatal Hernia Surface Area (HSA) Calculation

    The HSA can be calculated using:

    • Rhombus Formula:
      • HSA = (R × S) / 2
      • R = length of the crura from the crural commissure to the upper edge of the esophageal hiatus
      •  S = horizontal distance between the crura, including their thickness
         
    • Granderath Method:
      • Combines measurements of crural length (R) and arc (s) to calculate the dorsal crural commissure angle (Alpha):
        • Alpha1 = arcsin(s / 2) / R
        • Alpha0 = 2 × Alpha1
        • Arc = π × R × Alpha0 / 180
        • HSA = Arc × R / 2

    This method provides a precise estimation of hiatal surface area, particularly for complex or large hernias.

  2. Current ongoing studies on this topic

  3. Literature on the evidence report

    (1)   Madisch et al. (2023). S2k-Leitlinie Gastroösophageale Refluxkrankheit und eosinophile Ösophagitis der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS), März 2023 – AWMF-Registernummer: 021 – 013

     

    (2)   Broeders JA, Mauritz FA, Ahmed Ali U et al (2010) Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic Nissen (posterior total) versus Toupet (posterior partial) fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg 97:1318–1330

     

    (3)   Booth MI, Stratford J, Jones L, Dehn TC (2008) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic total (Nissen) versus posterior partial (Toupet) fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease based on preoperative oesophageal manometry. Br J Surg 95:57–63

     

    (4)   Chrysos E, Tsiaoussis J, Zoras OJ et al (2003) Laparoscopic surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease patients with impaired esophageal peristalsis: total or partial fundoplication? J Am Coll Surg 197:8–15

     

    (5)   Guérin E, Betroune K, Closset J et al (2007) Nissen versus Toupet fundoplication: results of a randomized and multicenter trial. Surg Endosc 21:1985–1990

     

    (6)   Laws HL, Clements RH, Swillie CM (1997) A randomized, prospective comparison of the Nissen fundoplication versus the Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Ann Surg 225:647–653

     

    (7)   Mickevicius A, Endzinas Z, Kiudelis M et al (2008) Influence of wrap length on the effectiveness of Nissen and Toupet fundoplication: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 22:2269–2276

     

    (8)   Shaw JM, Bornman PC, Callanan MD et al (2010) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic Nissen and laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a prospective, randomized trial. Surg Endosc 24:924–932

     

    (9)   Strate U, Emmermann A, Fibbe C et al (2008) Laparoscopic fundoplication: Nissen versus Toupet two-year outcome of a prospective randomized study of 200 patients regarding preoperative esophageal motility. Surg Endosc 22:21–30

     

    (10) Catarci M, Gentileschi P, Papi C et al (2004) Evidence-based appraisal of antireflux fundoplication. Ann Surg 239:325–337

     

    (11) Fein M, Seyfried F (2010) Is there a role for anything other than a nissen’s operation? J Gastrointest Surg 12:67–74

     

    (12) Stefanidis D, Hope WW, Kohn GP, et al. Guidelines for surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2647–69.

     

    (13) Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Koch OO, et al. Lower recurrence rates after mesh-reinforced versus simple hiatal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012;22:498-502.

     

    (14) Asti E, Sironi A, Bonitta G, et al. Crura augmentation with Bio-A(®) mesh for laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernia: single-institution experience with 100 consecutive patients. Hernia 2017;21:623-628. 

     

    (15) Balagué C, Fdez-Ananín S, Sacoto D, et al. Paraesophageal Hernia: To Mesh or Not to Mesh? The Controversy Continues. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2020;30:140-146. 

     

    (16) Keville S, Rabach L, Saad AR, et al. Evolution From the U-shaped to Keyhole-shaped Mesh Configuration in the Repair of Paraesophageal and Recurrent Hiatal Hernia. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2020;30:339-344. 

     

    (17) Koetje JH, Oor JE, Roks DJ, et al. Equal patient satisfaction, quality of life and objective recurrence rate after laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair with and without mesh. Surg Endosc 2017;31:3673-3680. 

     

    (18) Oor JE, Roks DJ, Koetje JH, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair using sutures versus sutures reinforced with non-absorbable mesh. Surg Endosc 2018;32:4579-4589. 

     

    (19) Watson DI, Thompson SK, Devitt PG, et al. Five Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Repair of Very Large Hiatus Hernia With Sutures Versus Absorbable Versus Nonabsorbable Mesh. Ann Surg 2020;272:241-247.

     

    (20) Frantzides CT, Madan AK, Carlson MA, et al. A prospective, randomized trial of laparoscopic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch repair vs simple cruroplasty for large hiatal hernia. Arch Surg 2002;137:649-52. 

     

    (21) Granderath FA, Schweiger UM, Kamolz T, et al. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication with prosthetic hiatal closure reduces postoperative intrathoracic wrap herniation: preliminary results of a prospective randomized functional and clinical study. Arch Surg 2005;140:40-8. 

     

    (22) Muller-Stich BP, Linke GR, Senft J, et al. Laparoscopic Mesh-augmented Hiatoplasty With Cardiophrenicopexy Versus Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication for the Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Double-center Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Surg 2015;262:721-5; discussion 725-7. 

     

    (23) Soricelli E, Basso N, Genco A, et al. Long-term results of hiatal hernia mesh repair and antireflux laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 2009;23:2499-504.

     

    (24) Stadlhuber RJ, Sherif AE, Mittal SK, et al. Mesh complications after prosthetic reinforcement of hiatal closure: a 28-case series. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1219-26. 

     

    (25) Parker M, Bowers SP, Bray JM, et al. Hiatal mesh is associated with major resection at revisional operation. Surg Endosc 2010;24:3095-101.

     

    (26) Rajkomar K, Wong CS, Gall L, MacKay C, MacDonald A, Forshaw M, Craig C. Laparoscopic large hiatus hernia repair with mesh reinforcement versus suture cruroplasty alone: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  Hernia 2023 Apr 3. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02783-2. Online ahead of print.

     

    (27) Mertens AC, Tolboom RC, Zavrtanik H, et al. Morbidity and mortality in complex robot-assisted hiatal hernia surgery: 7-year experience in a high-volume center. Surg Endosc. 2019;33:2152–61

     

    (28) Tolboom RC, Draaisma WA, Broeders IA. Evaluation of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic redo hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery: a cohort study. J Robot Surg. 2016;10:33–9.

     

    (29) Rengo M, Boru CE, Iossa A et al. Preoperative measurement of hiatal surface with MDCT: impact on surgical planning. La radiologica medica (2021) 126:1508-1517.

     

    (30) Granderath FA (2007) Measurement of the esophageal hiatus by calculation of the hiatal surface area (HSA). Why, when and how? Surg Endosc 21:2224–2225.

     

    (31) Granderath FA, Schweigner UM, Pointner R. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery: tailoring the hiatal closure to the size of hiatal surface area. Surg Endosc. 2007 Apr;21(4):542-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9041-7.Epub 2006 Nov 14.

Reviews

Surgical treatment of GERD: systematic review and meta-analysis.McKinley SK, Dirks RC, Walsh D, Hol

Activate now and continue learning straight away.

Single Access

Activation of this course for 3 days.

€7.99 inclusive VAT

Most popular offer

webop - Savings Flex

Combine our learning modules flexibly and save up to 50%.

from €3.29 / module

€39.50 / yearly payment

price overview

Robotik

Unlock all courses in this module.

€7.42 / month

€89.00 / yearly payment

  • literature search

    Literature search on the pages of pubmed.