In rectal cancer, curative therapy usually requires not only the resection of the primary tumor in healthy tissue (i.e., with sufficient safety margin) but also the partial or total removal of the mesorectum (PME, TME) and thus the removal of the regional lymphatic drainage area. Only in strictly selected cases is a curative resection possible through local measures.
The indications for robot-assisted deep anterior rectal resection therefore include:
- histologically confirmed malignant neoplasm of the rectum
- endoscopically non-removable or incompletely removable tumor with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia
- any deeper tumor mass in the rectum with a high suspicion of a malignant process
The indication for the surgical procedure in rectal cancer fundamentally depends on the tumor localization, especially the relations to the dentate line and the levator muscle, the depth of infiltration, and the sphincter function. Whenever possible, sphincter-preserving procedures should be preferred, assessing the long-term quality of life. In cases of poor sphincter function, a permanent colostomy should be preferred instead of a deep anterior resection, which is then performed depending on the safety margin to be achieved from the pelvic floor as rectal extirpation or pelvic floor preserving. If an adequate aboral safety margin cannot be ensured through a low anterior resection of the rectum, the following procedures should be applied depending on the exact height localization and potential infiltration:
- intersphincteric rectal resection
- abdominoperineal rectal extirpation,
Localization | Special Feature | Resection Procedure |
upper third | anterior resection | |
middle third | deep anterior resection | |
lower third | ||
ultra-low seated | without infiltration of the puborectalis sling, aboral distance >0.5 cm | intersphincteric resection |
infiltration of the puborectalis sling, aboral distance <0.5 cm | abdominoperineal rectal extirpation |
In Germany, the recommendations for the treatment of colon and rectal cancer are anchored in the S3 guidelines (S3 Guidelines Colorectal Cancer (Guideline Program Oncology (German Cancer Society, German Cancer Aid, AWMF): S3 Guidelines Colorectal Cancer. Status: 30.11.2017, valid until 29.11.2022, Retrieved on: 14.04.2023)
The following table summarizes the therapeutic concepts depending on the existing tumor situation and spread:
UICC | TNM | Subgroup | Therapy Recommendation |
I | T1, N0, MO | <3cm, G1-G2, L0, R0 | local excision sufficient (TEM= transanal microsurgery) |
>3cm or G3 or L1, R1/2 | oncological operation depending on height localization (TAR, intersphincteric resection, extirpation (see below) | ||
I | T2, N0, M0 | oncological operation depending on height localization (TAR, intersphincteric resection, extirpation (see below) | |
II | T3/T4, N0, M0 | upper third | TAR |
middle/lower third | neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy + | ||
oncological operation depending on height localization (TAR, intersphincteric resection, extirpation (see below) | |||
III | any T, N+, M0 | upper third | TAR |
middle/lower third | neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy + | ||
oncological operation depending on height localization (TAR, intersphincteric resection, extirpation (see below) | |||
IV | any T, any N, M+ | fundamentally | Individualized concepts |
symptomatic primary (bleeding) | primary resection | ||
symptomatic primary (stenosis) | primary stoma placement | ||
single superficial M hep | resection possible as part of primary resection | ||
M hep extensively resectable | Liver first or Chemo first | ||
M hep extensively unresectable | initially primary systemic therapy for asymptomatic primary and "Liver first" concept | ||
M per | possibly HIPEC for PCI<20 (Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index) |
Notes:
- A full wall excision is only sufficient for T1 tumors with a diameter of less than 3 cm with good to moderate differentiation without lymphatic vessel invasion and after R0 resection. However, even here, a higher recurrence risk is to be expected with an overall significantly lower complication rate and better functional results. Technically, transanal microsurgery appears to be advisable.
- UICC II and III situations are usually subjected to a neoadjuvant concept with the operation preceded by radiotherapy or radio-chemotherapy for tumors of the middle and lower thirds. The concept for tumors of the upper third follows that of colon cancer (see contribution to robot-assisted oncological sigmoid resection).
- cT3 tumors of the middle third without lymphatic vessel or vascular invasion and with very limited perirectal fat tissue infiltration in MRI are usually also subjected to primary surgery.
- Complete response: In the (rather rare) cases where no tumor is detectable after neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy clinically, endoscopically, and through imaging procedures (endosonography and MRI, alternatively possibly also CT), any surgery can be omitted. A prerequisite for a purely observational approach is the thorough explanation to the patient about the still insufficient validation of this approach and the patient's willingness to undergo very close follow-ups for at least 5 years. The optimal design for follow-ups or "watch & wait" is the subject of studies; the following follow-up procedure can be recommended according to an international expert commission: Follow-ups for 5 years after documentation of cCR; for three years every 3 months CEA, then every six months; for two years every 3 months digital-rectal examination, MRI, and endoscopy, then every six months; for 5 years CT thorax/upper abdomen months 6,12,24,36,48,60.