Compared to the open Lichtenstein repair of (unilateral and bilateral) inguinal hernia in adults, the following differences have been reported for the TAPP procedure:
- Slightly lower recurrence rates (↑↑ [5; 10; 13; 23])
- Usually, somewhat longer operating times (↑↑ [6; 11; 13; 15; 19; 22])
- About the same postoperative pain situation (↑↑ [6; 11; 17; 19; 21; 22; 24; 27]), somewhat less often chronic pain (↑↑ [7; 10; 20; 23])
- Speedier recovery (↑↑ [2; 6; 11-15; 19; 21; 22; 27])
- Generally higher cost of hospitalization, but presumably lower economic costs overall (↑↑ [2; 4; 12; 13; 20; 27])
Compared with the Shouldice procedure the following effects have been verified:
- Slightly lower rate of inguinal hernia recurrence (↑↑ [1; 3; 5; 14; 18; 26])
- Usually, somewhat longer operating times (↑↑ [3; 26])
- Slightly less postoperative pain (↑↑ [3; 14; 26])
- Speedier recovery (↑↑ [3; 6; 14; 26])
- Somewhat less often nerve lesions and chronic pain (↑ [5; 16])
Compared with the totally extraperitoneal procedure (TEP), the current data for the TAPP confirm the following:
- Somewhat shorter operating time (↑↑ [4; 6; 8])
- Similar pain intensity and recurrence rate
One trial comparing stapled mesh fixation with no mesh fixation found the following for TAPP: